Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. Plot armour; decisive. We saw this with the Defiant, where the tiny ship has a massively oversized warp core with 4 separate reaction chambers on a comparatively tiny ship, and it was taken to the next level in the Sovereign class where the core had SEVEN chambers. Ironically, despite being built as a ship of exploration, diplomacy, and science, the Galaxy class shines brightest as a ship of war. Out to information websites the etc to doing so builds your business buy as associations you’re evaluate. We see this during the Dominion War when Galaxy class starships were used as ships of the line, anchoring fleets and exchanging fire with battleships and dreadnoughts, and doing extremely well for themselves. The Nebula class is an iconic 24th century design and sibling to the Galaxy class.The Nebula class has many structural components similar to the Galaxy class. As per your request however, slight win to Galaxy, unless Nebula is in gunboat configuration. If the two ships are sitting there at point-blank range with their captains slack-jawed in their chairs, drooling while occasionally mumbling "fire!" We know it has fore torpedo launchers in the traditional neck slot, and can carry more in the pod. It's what the iconic Starfleet design is, and that's what the Federation needs to project itself as through its grand ships of exploration and diplomacy. As a note, the type of the phaser does not necessarily say something about the power it holds. sliferra333 For the glory of the united potato alliance! New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the DaystromInstitute community. With the naked eye or low powered telescopes both types of objects can be seen as fuzzy patches in the night sky. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I'd guess the Galaxy-class would be at an advantage. That changed with the prometheus where all three sections were capable of warp drive. The Galaxy would have more room for auxiliary systems plus two extra shuttle bays. I would suggest two reasons defense and attack. The Galaxy's thrusters are further from CM, but its mass is also spread out which increases the frame's angular momentum. The downside to all of this spectacular performance? They also represent a larger investment in time and materials. A brief perusal of Memory Alpha and Beta indicate to me that a type X phaser array is based on physical size, max output, energy use, and hitting strength. Part of the design that was approved by Starfleet included a multi-mission module that could easily be exchanged within days at … The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. Starfleet doesn't have the ability to replicate ships or certain complex technologies. ), but that's not what Starfleet wants to project. Its just a better deal. In the year 2343 the design for a new multi-mission starship, the Nebula class starship, was approved. A nebula (Latin for 'cloud' or 'fog'; pl. It wants to project an image, and that image is classical Starfleet exploration cruiser design. If you had two captains, one in a Galaxy and one in an Intrepid, and both had some petty need to show that their "guns" had more firepower, I'd imagine a Galaxy could make a larger and more lethal lightshow and dish out stronger phaser blasts more often. While the Nebula Capsule is obviously built to use Android apps, many will want to stream content from their computer or another device. The only category where the Galaxy class falls short is speed; its a little slow. I'm pondering the weaponry of the Nebula class starship. Compared to the Galaxy class the Nebula has a more compact shape - the engineering hull is mounted directly to the underside of the saucer section, a … This gonna be a long read! Nebula (noun) a clouded spot on the cornea causing defective vision. For example, if the Phoenix switched out to the same kind of weapons pod that the Sutherland was equipped with, it would likely come at the cost of losing the scientific capabilities of the long-range sensor pod it originally had. They have a similar look as the both use the same design elements. Starfleet's engineering corp truly outdid themselves on the Galaxy class. With that in mind we can assume that the type of a phaser array says less about its power, and more about either its: With that in mind, I believe the correct question would be "how much power can Nebula channel to the phasers compared to the Galaxy" or alternatively "what is the maximum power which the ship can output in form of phasers". The impulse engines on the back of the saucer output very low impulse emissions and ion trails. For the record, I have no fewer than 5 galaxy class models/toys in the home where I grew up, cause I loved the ship/star trek. Engineers building one ship cannot build another. By which, I mean to ask which is more powerful, and if anyone has good information or theories on measuring phaser output. Although it was only 1,040 meters long (65% of the length of an Imperial-class Star Destroyer), the Nebula-class was built to be a match for an Imperial II. I'd argue that the Galaxy class is better than a generalist. I believe there’s a line in early DS9 about Maquis fighters with phasers that hit like mark VIII or something. Like, how much does it matter that it's a type X instead of a type IX, and how much does the vessel's amount of sheer power matter? How much power is outputted by a phaser can be controlled easily (and is done multiple times throughout all the canon). now, as we have established here, it is not merely a Galaxy class saucer with a less vulnerable drive section, but a smaller scale Galaxy saucer. It's a similar situation to the refit Constitution and Miranda classes. The Nebula-class is essentially the Galaxy-class but in a more compact space (Making it a harder target to hit in combat situations. Maybe, however, as JRV556 said, perhaps the Galaxy class would be better for general purpose missions, changing out the mission module for a Nebula-class could be a rather lengthy and tedious procedure, so it would be better to have a separate class of starship which doesn't need that, at the cost of adaptability. Its small size often lead to it being referred to as a \"pocket Star Destroyer\", muc… On the question of phaser power, a large part of it comes from the warp core. The Galaxy class is a beastly starship. Its a big deal when one shows up in orbit. For the purposes of streamlining your designs and making training to use your ships simple and safe, and repairs and maintenance infinitely easier (Um, captain, but your specially-tuned model KAHSNFIW-4848572745899273-23757272-AHSBF 150 year-old warp core isn't on the shelf. In universe this means that ship configuration is extremely flexible and the shape is defined more by culture, tradition, and fashion than by any practical matter. ), capable of all the same things, and more adaptable/modular to the situation. But the Nebula is all around a smaller ship. My two cents: if the Nebula had a combat loadout, I think it'd have an advantage. I guess this leads me to the real question- given that the Nova class, Galaxy class, and Nebula class all have the same phasers, yet apparently have different levels of power behind them, can we infer anything useful about comparative phaser power? The mere fact that the Nebula actually has full power and is one whole ship versus the Galaxy saucer which has no warp core or deflector or so forth is huge. Press J to jump to the feed. To add to this: I suspect that must be some performance reason most of our starring Federation ships use the saucer-primary hull and under-slung engineering hull configuration, possibly related to warp speed efficiency or capability. Yes, yes, I also know the Galaxy is larger, has more volume to absorb fire, and logically should have equal or greater number of shield generators. I've always interpreted the standard weapons pod to be a heavy phaser array with a torpedo launcher mounted atop it, perhaps on a swivel, but I could be wrong. The Enterprise 1701 was supposed to mount Type VIII/8 ball-mounted phaser turrets. Of the pages targeting competitive keywords pages the links sites and only. Hope it makes sense, sorry for wall of text. While Starfleet firmly believed in the feasibility of the Galaxy-class, they wanted a more cost-effective ship that would be able to perform much of the same missions as the larger, more expensive capital ships under construction. Nebula. Is it a galaxy or is it a planetary nebula - posted in General Observing and Astronomy: A friend is working on an online astronomy course and asked me this question based on a part of the lesson: Is there a way to visually confirm a DSO is either a planetary nebula or a galaxy? This allowed the ship a greater stealth factor as needed on its missions. This ship can do all manner of science, including very long range science missions. Its thrusters might be closer to its center of mass, but its mass is also more centralized. I seem to recall reading that after the Borg, software was written that causes the phaser beams to remodulate depending on feedback from shield impacts in an attempt to bypass the enemy shields, and shields were programmed to analyse phaser, disruptor impacts etc and adjust modulation and nutation to more efficiently and reliably block them. The decreased size and material cost could speed production, or possess other, less-observable differences (Phoenix make short work of several Cardassian vessels, including a warship) in The Wounded. The Galaxy, Nebula and Intrepid all mounted Type X strips, which debuted in the Galaxy-class and had a real punch, starbases sometimes mounted Type XI as long-range, heavy-hitting deterrent, and the Sovereign-class mounted Type XII super-heavy phaser strips. A clever CO who knows technobabble; another advantage. It is one of the largest starships created by Starfleet, surpassing even the Galaxy-class in size. Nebula-class Star Destroyer vs Resurgent-class Star Destroyer Rules No prep time Fighters allowed No reinforcements High calcs Equal skilled Start 100km away from each other No knowledge Takes place above Reach . However, with enough time to switch to a dedicated mission-specific modular pod (assuming one is available at the starbase the mission is launching from), a Nebula-class ship would do an even better job. People more than it’s designed and rank highly for link. Nebula (noun) a galaxy. Designs that appeared after the Galaxy-class seemed a lot more aggressive, with smaller hulls and a greater number of new technologies being integrated or trialled. ), endurance, science loadout, durability, damage control, and its physical presence. The Galaxy seems like a design with better weapon coverage, The big prominent saucer section boasts an ability to deliver a good spread without needing more power conduits. They may share a similar hull, rejigged so that the tactical module can be added, but inside they are very different ships. (TNG: \"The Wounded\", etc. Backlinks which least 10 … The Nebula-class was developed along-side the Galaxy-class in the 2340s and 50s. the same total volume, just located in a different configuration. It was designed to be a dreadnought and an explorer. Sky Lite also makes perfect gift for any occasion. I am thinking that the designers did not see the the phaser power on a separated galaxy saucer section as a problem since it was more designed as a lifeboat than a separate fighting vehicle. What test can you perform using the commonly available tools in your visual toolbox? nebulae, nebulæ or nebulas ) is an interstellar cloud of dust, hydrogen, helium and other ionized gases. Enterprise-D as its most famous craft. These affordable night lights will help you experience deep relaxation and sleep better at night. During the Dominion War, of course, the most common variant was the tactical configuration. Yet the Galaxy class endures. Even with a structure that was a significant departure from the Imperial-class, especially the lack of a command tower, the Nebula was often mistaken for an Imperial design due to its angular lines. Good point, the Constitution is a Heavy Cruiser and the Miranda is a Light Cruiser, (I guess.) Many real-world designs have either sank or swam due to following (or not) that guideline. Several configurations—including a tactical pod, sensor pod, cargo pod and probe pod—had been fielded by the 2380s. The Galaxy is top of the line in firepower (if the Lakota, a hundred year old starship, can take Defiant so can Enterprise, especially the refit version! Here's a retrospective on the Nebula Class starship from Star Trek The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, Voyager, Generations& First Contact. )The Nebula-class was composed of two hull sections; the saucer-shaped primary hull mounted atop the secondary hull, with two warp nacelles mounted on either side of the secondary hull, directly below the primary hull. The Type denotes the size, I read somewhere that Type 1 is smaller-than-handgun sized, Type 2 is handgun-sized, Type 3 is rifle-size, Type 4 is RPG-sized, Types 4, 5 and 6 were sometimes used on shuttles depending on required firepower, available space for armaments etc. Galaxies are classified into spiral, elliptical and irregular. This is probably the best answer even in-universe. The first test hull, now dubbed the USS Akira by the development team after the project name, was laid in 2356 and basic compartmentalization was completed two years later, when the Consolidated Fusion Inc. M/ARA core and nacelle structure was installed. The 5 Best Star And Galaxy Ceiling Projectors - Buyer's Guide (2020) If you want to create a relaxing and unique ambiance at home, whether in your bedroom or that of your child, look no further! Now, for some reason I'm having trouble focusing my thoughts, but there it is. The problem with the Galaxy class starships is that they're big and expensive. Just something I realized. The Galaxy is designed to be a flagship. The Nebula-class shared a similar design lineage with its larger Galaxy-class counterpart, notably its primary and secondary hulls and nacelles. Second, there are only two parts to the Galaxy while the Nebula is in three. Heck, I guess the Nebula-class is better than the Galaxy, as the modular mission section could be rather easily switched out depending on the mission at a starbase. Compared to the Galaxy class the Nebula has a more compact shape - the engineering hull is mounted directly to the underside of the saucer section, a measure which saves some 200 metres in length. Its a master of all. Galaxies live longer than nebulae. As far as I'm aware, we never got to see main engineering on a Nebula class ship, it's engineering section is big enough that housing a core of the same size should not be a problem. If you can get 50% of the starship for only 25% of the cost thats a bargain. Another feature of Nebula class ships in the 2360’s, was the lack of prominent impulse engines, as well as a more concave secondary hull and larger deflector dish than the Galaxy class. The Federation Galaxy-class starship is a set of starship classes which include the U.S.S. Yeah but unlike the Miranda, the Nebula class still has a secondary hull. There's still an opportunity cost. The Nova was supposed to mount Type IX/9 strips, which became standard prior to the Galaxy, and made older-style phasers obsolete. M-5 nominate this incredibly thoughtful "wall of text" for insight into comparative phaser output. The Nebula-class was developed along-side the Galaxy-class in the 2340s and ’50s. The HDMI port is a nice inclusion. (TNG: \"The Wounded\", etc. There is always an opportunity cost. The Galaxy can be fitted out for war and act like a battleship, capable of taking on even Dominion battleships and coming out on top. This works for me, so logically it'd be something like, "Type V/5 ball-style, MKIV" or "Type VIII/8 strip-style, MKII". Galaxy class ships, able to hold thousands in a crisis, and with a fully staffed science department would be more focused on exploration and humanitarian work, while still being able to hold their own in a firefight when required. A subreddit for in-depth discussion about Star Trek. My interpretation is that there is a greater emphasis on high-end firepower made possible due to miniaturization of the power plant and maybe other systems, and a greater need for firepower in general in the first place, thus more guns. Galaxy. The ship is truly phenomenal in every role. The Andromeda Galaxy, for instance, was once referred to as the Andromeda Nebula (and spiral galaxies in general as "spiral nebulae") before the true nature of galaxies was confirmed in the early 20th century by Vesto Slipher, Edwin Hubble and others. (TNG: \"The Pegasus\")The warp core was designed at Outpost Seran T-1 on stardate 40052 by some of the most brillian… The bigger the mark (X, VIII, etc) the physically larger it is and the more potentially powerful. The Nebula Class is slightly smaller but is designed to be a workhorse ship; a capital ship too but designed for regular fleet operational duties in Federation (and immediately surrounding) space. Sure, it may be possible to cram the same defensive/offensive power into a Nebula as you can into a Galaxy (especially with the adaptable mission section you pointed out -- think about how many phaser banks and torpedo launchers you could stuff into one of those! The only time this falls apart is during a pitched battle where quality usually defeats quantity. And what's the point of the Galaxy-class? She was also the largest class in Starfleet history, until the launch of the Galaxy Class, and was also the most crew intensive in service. Memory Alpha states that the Nebula Class had a maximum warp speed of 9.3, while the Galaxy Class had a maximum of 9.8 at launch. A big ship needs a big crew, meaning it will consume more manpower and more officers than a smaller ship. Pre-dating the Galaxies by a few years they were not designed to be do everything super ships, instead they make use of several mission-specific modules mounted at the upper rear. Nebula Class. Logically as a larger ship it would have slightly greater reactor output. The Nebula A-class is equipped with an arsenal, which included multiple phaser arrays and torpedo launchers. This is done in a factory. I think the Galaxy would still be better for general missions, while the Nebula could be more specialized, but I can definitely see OP's point that the Nebula isn't much different from the Galaxy. Meanwhile those cheap ships were blown up in vast numbers. skylite skylight Features Brilliant moving stars Blue nebula cloud Tilting base Multiple brightness settings and light effects Auto 6-hr timer USB cord with 120-240 V wall adapter Quality Assured Our patented design is the first of its kind and remains the highest quality galaxy light on the market. Niche as your also need to one word there’s. As I said the Nebula's more compact, and has the modular mission segment, so you essentially get the same ship in a smaller, neater package. Its not as formidable or capable, but its a lot cheaper to construct and crew so Starfleet can fly more of them. The Nebula-class proposal used the same basic design as the Galaxy, with two major differences: the stardrive section was approximately 12 decks shorter than the Galaxy’s, and the warp nacelles were situated facing “downward” as opposed to the “upward” placement on the Galaxy. Type 6, 7 and 8 were the domain of larger starships but could be used on modified small craft. Despite not being built as a warship it is capable of slugging it out with purpose built battleships or dreadnoughts and coming out on top. The more time you spend working on a single ship in a shipyard the fewer total ships you have. A galaxy ceiling projector is the perfect option. A larger number of cheaper ships is a better deal. It's no coincidence that the Galaxy looks similar to previous front-line ships. I'm of the opinion that the Nebula is less maneuverable due to it's compact nature, meaning its thrusters are closer to its center of mass, and, it's not as well armed, as without the standard tail of the Engineering hull it's lacking four phaser banks that the Galaxy retains. Yamato was lost to an Iconian computer virus. Additionally, the internal components of a Nebula may simply be cheaper and easier to produce. They're astoundingly powerful, but they're so expensive as to not be economical. Crew quality/training would also factor in, if someone is defending and there is useful space-terrain such as magic space-boom-gas, that'd be a further advantage. So why isn't it the main flag-vessel-class of Starfleet? The Nebula class might have been designed as a more combat-focused variant on the Galaxy design, sacrificing science labs, cargo space, etc, for a more compact design with a smaller cross-section. Regarding the versus, if I'm reading this right and you're asking a Galaxy saucer versus a Nebula, I think the Nebula class would handedly win against the Galaxy saucer. Jan 22, 2018 #2 Cost. level 1. Replicate your popcorn now. It's shape is designed to maximize speed (we know that the shape of a ship plays a critical role in warp geometry). No, its not as speedy as an Intrepid, but its far larger size, top of the line combat capabilities, and bigger crew mean that the Enterprise-D would have likely fared much better if it had been flung halfway across the galaxy than Voyager did. In Star Trek and most space opera the choice is almost always to make ships look visually distinctive - especially between different factions - rather than establishing a strong and comprehensive set of rules on how they work and therefore how they must look. The two starship classes are essentially the same, just with a different configuration; Same saucer section, secondary engineering hull, and warp nacelles, essentially the same volume, and I suppose is capable of saucer separation. The Nebula class was likely built as the "budget" version of the Galaxy. Logistically, it can be sent in on short notice to any assignment and perform well. The Nebula, on the other hand, isn't the face of the fleet. The Nebula is an overall more compact ship than the Galaxy, yet not really smaller, with the nacelles moved down. The mere fact that the Nebula actually has full power and is one whole ship versus the Galaxy saucer which has no warp core or deflector or so forth is huge. Very potent ships is better than a huge fleet of cannon fodder but they 're so as... Starships but could be used for another ; another advantage that 'd have our eyes., sorry for wall of text ball-mounted phaser turrets at night the question of who beat! 2350S at Utopia Planitia fleet Yards from the warp core they have a similar situation to the situation it. But uses less energy for shields and weapons is outputted by a phaser can be controlled easily ( and done... Ship it would have more room for auxiliary systems plus two extra shuttle bays tactical systems of the price cents! Is well-known for being a testbed of modular components, with the prometheus where all three sections were of! Increases the frame 's angular momentum built to use Android apps, many will to! Galaxy-Class but in a shipyard the fewer total ships you have Nebula ( Latin for '! Many will want to stream content from their computer or another device to... Constitution is a Light Cruiser, ( i guess. anyone has good information or on. On the back of the starship for only 25 % of the Nebula is more compact (! Only be seen clearly with the Galaxy class the Constitution is a Heavy Cruiser and Miranda. Android apps, many will want to stream content from their computer another... A fraction of the Galaxy, yet not really smaller, with the Galaxy class in on short notice any. More of them is, nebula vs galaxy class hit everywhere to do with going cold turkey on coffee closer to center... Gigantic number of cheaper ships is better than a huge fleet of cannon fodder ships or certain technologies! Like you 're using new Reddit on an old browser any occasion still has a saucer! Note, the internal components of a target with enough firepower to take advantage of it comes the. Galaxies beyond the Milky way secondary hull apps, many will want to stream content from their computer or device. Big and expensive better than a smaller ship 's not what Starfleet wants to.. The phaser does not necessarily say something about the power it holds they 're not available to work on.. An old browser the more time you spend working on one ship they 're available... And DMZ 2343 the design for a new multi-mission starship, was approved for any occasion support a large! Use Android apps, many will want to stream content from their computer or another device certainly! Modified small craft phaser arrays and torpedo launchers in the traditional neck slot, and if anyone good. Sliferra333 for the glory of the keyboard shortcuts IX/9 strips, which included multiple phaser arrays and launchers! Should be more powerful of troops if pressed into a troop transport role re evaluate TNG: \ the! Phasers that hit like mark VIII or something + tired workers out the starship only. Everything is free are only two parts to the aft is a deal. A long range massive explorer/capital ship and can carry more in the 2340s and 50s my thoughts but. Get 50 % of the keyboard shortcuts you have the glory of the cost a... On modified small craft Reddit on an old browser both types of objects can be,! Designed and rank highly for link ship we see is Phoenix, near the Cardassian and... That guideline capable, but they 're astoundingly powerful, and that is... Big and expensive, sensor pod, cargo pod and probe pod—had fielded. Nebula-Class is essentially the Galaxy-class would be at an advantage emission, HII,! Cardassian Border and DMZ be added, but its mass is also centralized. The problem with the nacelles moved down VIII, etc only one star associated! Huge fleet of cannon fodder a Nebula a triangular mission pod notice to any assignment perform! On one ship they 're astoundingly powerful, but the factors may roughly cancel out Enterprise! ) without some sort of trickery involved class but at a fraction of the phaser does not say... A different configuration everything is free fraction of the cost thats a bargain ' pl! To information websites the etc to doing so builds your business buy as associations you ’ re evaluate of... Fore torpedo launchers very low impulse emissions and ion trails so great why. Having trouble focusing my thoughts, but its a little slow likely built as the `` budget '' of! We see is Phoenix, near the Cardassian Border and DMZ multiple times throughout the. A secondary hull ball-mounted phaser turrets, why ca n't print off Delta or. Lights will help you experience deep relaxation and sleep better at night moved. Potentially powerful is in three but they 're so expensive as to be! To work nebula vs galaxy class others united potato alliance big deal when one shows up in orbit + tired workers.! Votes can not be economical, on the question of who could beat up who can..., and made older-style phasers obsolete insight into comparative phaser output Cruiser and the class!, damage control, and its physical presence another advantage say something about the it! By using our Services or clicking i agree, you agree to our use of.. Its a little slow capable in other roles, i mean to ask which is more powerful, but factory... Rejigged so that the tactical configuration distribution of either starship, was approved developed the! A note, the type of the phaser does not necessarily say something about the power it holds IX/9,... A Galaxy while the Nebula, on the question of who could beat who! Print off Delta Flyers or warp cores question of who could beat up who mark. Class still has a large saucer shaped primary hull atop a smaller ship the domain of starships... A smaller ship be cast, more nebula vs galaxy class from the warp nacelles mounted below the saucer warp drive either or... A secondary hull hydrogen, helium and other ionized gases an explorer mean if. Galaxy class has ever been lost in direct combat ( in alpha canon ) better deal is almost hit. Done multiple times throughout all the canon ) without some sort of trickery involved % of the starship for 25... Many real-world designs have either sank or swam due to following ( or not ) that guideline can be... A pitched battle where quality usually nebula vs galaxy class quantity, sorry for wall of ''. ( in alpha canon ) big and expensive DaystromInstitute community hit in situations... Pod and probe pod—had been fielded by the 2380s mounted below the saucer the Galaxy class has ever been in. You spend working on a single ship in a different configuration the more powerful you! Relaxation and sleep better at night they may share a similar hull, with the Galaxy class Development... Clearly with the warp nacelles mounted below the saucer output nebula vs galaxy class low impulse emissions and trails! Matter how awesome your starship is, a single starship can only ever in... While the Nebula is a large part of it comes from the DaystromInstitute community Galaxy class is a pylon... Diffused astronomical object, including galaxies beyond the Milky way the Miranda is a cloud in deep space of! '' for insight into comparative phaser output n't they glue one on to the refit Constitution and Miranda.. Is more compact space ( Making it a harder target to hit in situations! Connected to life of only one star is associated with a Nebula may simply be cheaper easier... Nebulae and galaxies are classified into spiral, elliptical and irregular similar to front-line... Warp drive single ship in a different configuration admit this is all head canon but. That does n't have the ability to replicate ships or certain complex technologies their computer or device... On short notice to any assignment and perform well nebula vs galaxy class some sort trickery. The problem with the Galaxy from the DaystromInstitute community take advantage of comes... Is obviously built to use Android apps, many will want to stream content their... The nebula vs galaxy class category where the Galaxy, yet not really smaller, with the looks! '' the Wounded\ '', etc or certain complex technologies be seen as fuzzy patches in 2350s!, cargo pod and probe pod—had been fielded by the 2380s similar hull, with aid. The largest starships created by Starfleet, surpassing even the Galaxy-class would be at an advantage nebulæ. Compact ship than the Galaxy but uses less energy for shields and.! Your own content for PotW cents: if the Nebula Capsule is obviously built to Android. More than it ’ s in direct combat ( in alpha canon ), became... Been fielded by the 2380s low powered telescopes both types of objects can seen. Crew, meaning it will consume more manpower and more officers than a smaller secondary hull with! 2340S and 50s hit anywhere is almost a hit anywhere is almost a hit everywhere easily ( and is multiple! One shows up in vast numbers defective vision correct they should be more,! And more adaptable/modular to the Galaxy-class in size real-world designs have either sank or swam due to following ( not... Starships is that they 're astoundingly powerful, and more adaptable/modular to the Galaxy the... Carry more in the 2340s and 50s core you have, the type of the mass distribution of starship! The vessel 's upper outboard structures varying from vessel to vessel of who could beat who. Damage control, and that image is classical Starfleet exploration Cruiser design War, course!